Kolačići su neophodni za funkcionalnost internetske stranice i omogućavaju vam da ostanete prijavljeni. Pomoću kolačića prikupljamo i statističke podatke. Oni nam pomažu da saznamo kako koristite Bookmate kako bi mogli poboljšati internetsku stranicu i preporuke za knjige.
Za više informacija, pročitajte našu Politiku kolačića.
Prihvati sve kolačiće
Postavke kolačića
Rationally Speaking #16 - Deferring to Experts, NYC Skeptics
en
Free
NYC Skeptics

Rationally Speaking #16 - Deferring to Experts

Slušajte u aplikaciji
At a talk he gave at TAM 8, Massimo argued that non-experts in a field aren't qualified to reject an expert consensus, such as that on anthropogenic climate change. Most recently, he has taken Jerry Coyne to task for making a philosophical argument without having the necessary expertise. This raises a number of questions: Are there fields that have no experts, or that have pretend experts? If there is a lot of disagreement among experts on a topic, should we take any individual expert's opinion less seriously? How much consensus is required before a non-expert should say, "OK, looks like this question really is settled"?

Perhaps noted expert George Carlin had it right when he said: "I have as much authority as the pope, I just don't have as many people who believe it."
više
0:34:51
Godina izdanja
2010
Jeste li već pročitali? Kakvo je vaše mišljenje?
👍👎
fb2epub
Povucite i ispustite datoteke (ne više od 5 odjednom)